USPTO serial 75186650
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SAARBRUCKEN, DE
Greenwood Village, CO
IDS Prof. Scheer Gesellschaft fur integriete Datenverarbeitungs-systeme mbH
66115 Saarbrucken, DE
Bellevue, WA
SAARBRUCKEN, DE
SAARBRUCKEN, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH J SERRITELLA
Joseph J. Serritella Pepper Hamilton LLP18th and Arch Streets3000 Two Logan SquarePhiladelphia, PA 19103| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business process reengineering services in the field of integrated data processing systems for information and communication in the areas of corporate organization, office automation and implementation | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | training in the use and operation of data processing systems for information and communication in the areas of corporate organization, office automation and electronic data processing; conducting seminars and presentations for data processing systems for information and communication in the areas of corporate organization, office automation and electronic data processing | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | computer programming services, namely, creation of integrated data processing systems for information and communication in the areas of corporate organization, office automation and implementation; design of computer software data processing programs for others; computer consultation in the field of data processing systems for information and communication in the areas of corporate organization, office automation and electronic data processing | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2011 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 25, 2011 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 3, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |