Drawing for ARIS HOUSE OF BUSINESS ENGINEERING

USPTO serial 75186650

ARIS HOUSE OF BUSINESS ENGINEERING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2888052Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 28, 2004
Examiner
SMIGA, HOWARD
Law office
—

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARIS HOUSE OF BUSINESS ENGINEERING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH J SERRITELLA

Joseph J. Serritella Pepper Hamilton LLP18th and Arch Streets3000 Two Logan SquarePhiladelphia, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035business process reengineering services in the field of integrated data processing systems for information and communication in the areas of corporate organization, office automation and implementationSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
041training in the use and operation of data processing systems for information and communication in the areas of corporate organization, office automation and electronic data processing; conducting seminars and presentations for data processing systems for information and communication in the areas of corporate organization, office automation and electronic data processingSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—
042computer programming services, namely, creation of integrated data processing systems for information and communication in the areas of corporate organization, office automation and implementation; design of computer software data processing programs for others; computer consultation in the field of data processing systems for information and communication in the areas of corporate organization, office automation and electronic data processingSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2011C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Mar 31, 2011CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Mar 25, 2011C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Mar 25, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 25, 2011ES7STEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 28, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 16, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 4, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 4, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 3, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 19, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 18, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance