Drawing for THE ARENA

USPTO serial 75196105

THE ARENA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MADDEN, ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE ARENA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DOUGLAS W KENYON

DOUGLAS W KENYON HUNTON & WILLIAMSP O BOX 109RALEIGH, NC 27602UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041interactive game services provided over a global computer networkACTIVEMay 24, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2001OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 6, 2001ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 6, 2001OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 30, 2001OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 28, 2000ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 23, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 16, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance