Drawing for CYBER-KNIGHT

USPTO serial 75199600

CYBER-KNIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHARLON, BARNEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYBER-KNIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE R JORDAN

LAWRENCE R JORDAN SEELIGSON AND JORDAN301 E LIBERTY STE 250ANN ARBOR, MI 48104UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028ROLE PLAYING GAME EQUIPMENT IN THE NATURE OF GAME BOOK MANUALSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 16, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 14, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 14, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 17, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 1, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 16, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 30, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance