USPTO serial 75200956
INTERNET TOWN CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERNET TOWN CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN K. UILKEMA
JOHN K UILKEMA THELEN, REID & PRIEST, LLPP O BOX 190187SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94119-0187UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | providing business management consulting and business advisory and business marketing assistance to banks, financial institutions, businesses and merchants fo rpromotion of their services relating to transfer for value transactions via computer networks; protection against fraud, and managing and assisting in electronic transfer of data via computer networks and telecommunications links | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | consulting and engineering services in the nature of the design, selection and use of computer networks, terminals and interconnected peripherals, software, telecommunication links and platforms used in connection with transfer for value transactions, transfer payments and data and information transfer related thereto via private and public networks, namely, global computer network systems for banks, financial institutions, businesses retail merchants and their customers; custom design of computer software for bank office and internal operations of banks, financial institutions, business and merchants related to transfer for value transactions via telecommunication links and private and public computer system networks, such as the global computer network, and written instructions therefore; and establishing web sites for others on a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |