Drawing for INSIDE THE SAT

USPTO serial 75202389

INSIDE THE SAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSIDE THE SAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RALPH H LANE

RALPH H LANE PATTISHALL MCAULIFFE NEWBURY ET AL311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009videotapes, video discs, computer programs and CD-ROMs in the field of educational test preparation, namely, in the field of preparation for taking scholastic aptitude tests and scholastic assessment testsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 30, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 30, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 20, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 29, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
May 24, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Nov 12, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 12, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 12, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance