USPTO serial 75204198
SUNCRETE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUNCRETE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sudbury, Ontario P3E 5C4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN G CHUPA
JOHN G CHUPA THE CHUPA LAW FIRM PC31313 NORTHWESTERN HWY STE 205FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48334UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | cement products, namely, cement and shotcrete posts, concrete mixes, fast setting shotcrete mixes, high strength shotcrete mixes, and cement and gypsum aggregates for mixing with sand or gravel and water for use in mining, oil wells, and construction applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |