USPTO serial 75208092
WATER BEETLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLINGTON, THOMAS W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WATER BEETLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ville St-Laurent, Quebec H4S 1R9, CA
Ville St-Laurent, Quebec H4S 1R9, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORM D ST LANDAU
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP NORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST NWSTE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | water leisure products, namely, electric or human powered pedal boats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |