USPTO serial 75212680
VOLLMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VOLLMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vollmer Werke Maschinenfabrik GmbH
D-88400 Biberach/Riss, DE
Other trademarks owned by Vollmer Werke Maschinenfabrik GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
FREIDRICH KUEFFNER
342 MADISON AVE STE 1921NEW YORK, NY 10173UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINES FOR CUTTING WOOD, SAW SHARPENING MACHINES, SAW TOOTH SETTING MACHINES, PLANE KNIFE GRINDING MACHINES; MACHINE PARTS, NAMELY, SAW BLADE GUIDES; ERODING MACHINES WITH WIRE AND ROTATIONAL ELECTRODES FOR CUTTING TOOLS; PLANING KNIVES; GRINDING MACHINES FOR TOOLS; MACHINES FOR THE TENSIONING AND ADJUSTING OF SAW BLADES; MACHINES FOR STELLITING SAW BLADES; MACHINES FOR THE GRINDING OF MILLING CUTTERS AND DRILLS; MACHINES FOR SOLDERING ON HARD METAL TEETH; PARTS OF ALL AFOREMENTIONED MACHINES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |