USPTO serial 75246575
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
West Palm Beach, FL
West Palm Beach, FL
West Palm Beach, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN M DALY
SETH P ROBERT BROWN LOCURTO & ROBERT, LLP101 N E THIRD AVE SECOND FLFT LAUDERDALE, FL 33414UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunication consulting services in the area of advanced telecommunication system development, namely, conducting feasibility studies and consulting on the creation and installation of telecommunication advanced network systems for transmitting data, voice, and video over wire and wireless mediums | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2002 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2002 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2002 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 13, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |