USPTO serial 75248737
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Buffalo Roller Hockey Club, LLC, The
Syracuse, NY
Other trademarks owned by Buffalo Roller Hockey Club, LLC, The
Buffalo Roller Hockey Club, LLC, The
Syracuse, NY
Other trademarks owned by Buffalo Roller Hockey Club, LLC, The
Buffalo Roller Hockey Club, LLC, The
Syracuse, NY
Other trademarks owned by Buffalo Roller Hockey Club, LLC, The
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MITCHELL E RADIN
MITCHELL E RADIN COWAN DEBAETS ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP41 MADISON AVE 34TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |