USPTO serial 75264243
FLAVOR SUN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FLAVOR SUN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
South San Francisco, CA
South San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY B DIEPENBROCK
ANTHONY B DIEPENBROCK TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | snack food items, namely, roasted corn kernels, roasted dried beans, dried sugar beets, dried beans in chip form, vegetable fibers in wafer form, salad in dried bar form, fruits and vegetables in jerky form, and bar form, and fruits and vegetables which are made by the processes of osmovac, extrusion, infusion, and vacuum fry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 5, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |