Drawing for GO WHERE NO IDEA HAS GONE BEFORE

USPTO serial 75273443

GO WHERE NO IDEA HAS GONE BEFORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GO WHERE NO IDEA HAS GONE BEFORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GREGORY S GEWIRTZ

GREGORY S GEWIRTZ LERNER DAVID LITTENBERG KRUMHOLZ& MENTLIK600 S AVE WWESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1497

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electrically conductive compositions for use in manufacture which are used to produce interactive light and sound effects when touchedACTIVE—
016books, namely, fiction books, science fiction books, action books, romance books, sports books and text books dealing with a variety of topics incorporation electrically conductive coatings for producing sounds or visual effects when touched; and postersACTIVE—
028full line of toys and games incorporating electrically conductive coatings for producing sounds and visual effects when touchedACTIVE—
042licensing of intellectual properties, namely, patents and trademarks concerning the use of electrically conductive compositions which are used to produce interactive effects when touched and technical know-how related theretoACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2000ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 11, 2000OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 11, 2000OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 19, 1999OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 3, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 27, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 21, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 27, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 30, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance