USPTO serial 75275363
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
LONGUEUIL, CA
MEDIAGRIF INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Longueuil, Québec, CA
Other trademarks owned by MEDIAGRIF INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1A1, CA
MEDIAGRIF INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
LONGUEUIL, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by MEDIAGRIF INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
MEDIAGRIF INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
LONGUEUIL, QUEBEC, CA
Other trademarks owned by MEDIAGRIF INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Oppedahl Patent Law Firm LLC
Oppedahl Patent Law Firm LLC OPPEDAHL PATENT LAW FIRM LLCP O Box 351240Westminster, CO 80035UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND DATABASES PERTAINING TO PROCUREMENT, BUYING, SELLING AND TENDERING INFORMATION AND OPPORTUNITIES RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIA; COMPUTER DISKS, TAPES AND COMPACT DISKS CONTAINING INFORMATION ON OR PERTAINING TO PROCUREMENT, BUYING, SELLING AND TENDERING INFORMATION AND OPPORTUNITIES ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | publications, namely, books, newspapers, periodicals, magazines, pamphlets and manuals pertaining to procurement, buying, selling and tendering information and opportunities | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF COMPUTER NETWORKS AND TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS FOR OTHERS PERTAINING TO PROCUREMENT BUYING, SELLING AND TENDERING INFORMATION AND OPPORTUNITIES; COMPUTER DATABASE MANAGEMENT; PROVIDING INFORMATION PERTAINING TO PROCUREMENT, BUYING, SELLING AND TENDERING INFORMATION AND OPPORTUNITIES RELATING TO GOODS, SERVICES, AND CONSTRUCTION VIA COMPUTER, COMPUTER NETWORKS, TELEPHONE, THE INTERNET OR ELECTRONIC MAIL | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | [ BUSINESS BROKERAGE SERVICES AND RELATED CONSULTING PERTAINING TO PROCUREMENT, BUYING, SELLING AND TENDERING INFORMATION AND OPPORTUNITIES ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION OF INTERNET SITES FOR OTHERS PERTAINING TO PROCUREMENT BUYING, SELLING AND TENDERING OF INFORMATION AND OPPORTUNITIES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2023 | EWOR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 17, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 9, 2019 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2018 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Sep 29, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2018 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Aug 28, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 17, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 21, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 29, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2009 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2009 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2009 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2007 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |