USPTO serial 75294349
TOWEL WONDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOWEL WONDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Don Mills, Ontario M3B 2B3, CA
Don Mills, Ontario M3B 2B3, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC C. DEVENNY
ERIC C DEVENNY RIDOUT & MAYBEE LLP150 METCALFE ST FL 19OTTAWA, ON K2P 1P1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | tie down non-metallic clip or fastener used to secure and hold down various objects | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |