USPTO serial 75297677
COOL MAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2471817Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 24, 2001
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COOL MAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA
Newport Beach, CA
Newport Beach, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | prepared, processed and canned fruits and vegetables | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 15, 2000 |
| 030 | tea; herbal tea; tea and herbal tea-based beverages with fruit flavoring both natural and artificial; frozen confections with tea, herbal tea and/or fruit flavoring both natural and artificial | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 7, 2000 |
| 032 | isotonic sports drinks; beer; malt beer; isotonic drinks; isotonic soft drinks; fruit juices and soft drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 15, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cano, Kristin M.
- Other trademarks owned by Cano, Kristin M.
- Other trademarks owned by Cano, Kristin M.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named COOL MAX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 14, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 20, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |