Drawing for HARRY'S BAR

USPTO serial 75299445

HARRY'S BAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARRY'S BAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GEORGE B SNYDER

GEORGE B SNYDER WHITMAN BREED ABBOTT & MORGAN LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 21, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 21, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 21, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 10, 2000CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 7, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 29, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 8, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 1998REINREINSTATED—
Sep 2, 1998ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 18, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance