USPTO serial 75305882
REMINGTON SUITES HOTEL CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REMINGTON SUITES HOTEL CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J MIKE AMERSON
J MIKE AMERSON ARNOLD WHITE & DURKEE750 BERING DR STE 400HOUSTON, TX 77057UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 22, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |