CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CSELT

USPTO serial 75306144

CSELT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERK, STEVEN R
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CSELT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT DUBNO

HERBERT DUBNO THE FIRM OF KARL F ROSS PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE BOX 900RIVERDALE (BRONX), NY 10471-0900UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for design of telecommunication and information technology networks and for design of component parts of the networks; computer software to manage telecommunication networks; computer hardware and software for speech, image and multimedia signal processing; computer hardware and software for testing and monitoring telecommunication and information technology networks and component parts of the networks; computer hardware and software for testing communications protocols; telemedicine, teleworking and support systems for the elderly or disabled comprising computer hardware and software for offering remote audio and video monitoring and communicationsACTIVE—
016scientific and technical magazines and books containing information as to telecommunication and information technology networks and describing the evolution and state of the art in specific fields of telecommunications and information technology, including telemedicine, teleworking and support systems for the elderly or disabled comprising computer hardware and software for offering remote audio and video monitoring and communicationsACTIVE—
042technical consultation, research and design for others in the field of telecommunication and information technology networks, including telemedicine, teleworking and support systems for the elderly or disabled comprising computer hardware and software for offering remote audio and video monitoring and communications; testing, analysis and evaluation of the telecommunication and information technology networks and component parts of such networks of others for the purpose of qualification; computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data over a global computer computer network including information documentation and retrieval of information regarding telecommunications and information technology by searching bibliographic references, conference papers and patents from electronic data bases on the world wide web and elsewhere, document procurement and supplyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 11, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 6, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 25, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance