USPTO serial 75306584
Serial No. 75306584
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUTTON, JENNIFER JO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 75306584?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wiltshire, SN15 5JN, GB
WILTSHIRE, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW N SPIVAK
ANDREW N SPIVAK MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP1650 TYSONS BLVD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22102-3915UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Vacuum cleaners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |