USPTO serial 75306771
R2-D2
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 7, 2000
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with R2-D2?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LUCASFILM ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY LTD.
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by LUCASFILM ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY LTD.
Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. LLC
San Francisco, CA
Other trademarks owned by Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. LLC
San Francisco, CA
NICASIO, CA
NICASIO, CA
Nicasio, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Naomi E. Abraham
Naomi E. Abraham The Walt Disney Company500 South Buena Vista StreetIP Department - Trademark GroupBurbank, CA 91521Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | [ playsets for action figures; skateboards; three dimensional puzzles; toy helmets; toy model rocket kits and accessories therefor sold as a unit; jigsaw puzzles] ; toy action figures; plush toys; [ in-line skates; ] Christmas tree ornaments; [ construction toys; toy building blocks and connecting links for the same; protective pads and padding for skateboarding, in-line skating and roller skating ] | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LUCASFILM ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Lucasfilm Entertainment Company Ltd. LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LUCAS LICENSING LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by LUCAS LICENSING LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by LUCAS LICENSING LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Lucasfilm Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named R2-D2
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2025 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | C.7C | NEW CERTIFICATE UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2024 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 10, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 10, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 9, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 16, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 31, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 1, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |