USPTO serial 75306898
1-888-RETIRES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 1-888-RETIRES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, L4V 1W1, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WM MARSHALL LEE
WM MARSHALL LEE LEE MANN SMITH MCWILLIAMS SWEENEY ET ALP O BOX 2786CHICAGO, IL 60690-2786UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | MEMBER BENEFIT SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING REBATES AND PURCHASE DISCOUNTS TO APPLICANT'S MEMBERS FOR USE AT THE PARTICIPATING ESTABLISHMENTS OF OTHERS THROUGH THE USE OF MEMBERSHIP CARDS AND DISCOUNT COUPONS; INVESTMENT OF FUNDS FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, APPLICANT'S MEMBERS, TO PROVIDE RETIREMENT, EDUCATIONAL, GIFT OR SPECIAL PURPOSE FUNDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |