Drawing for QUEEN PADME NABERRIE AMIDALA

USPTO serial 75306930

QUEEN PADME NABERRIE AMIDALA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUEEN PADME NABERRIE AMIDALA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CAROLE F. BARRETT

CAROLE F BARRETT COUDERT BROTHERSEMBARCADERO4 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 3300SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4184

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computers; computer peripherals; interactive entertainment software, namely, interactive video game programs, interactive multimedia computer game programs, interactive video games of virtual reality comprised of computer hardware and software; computer game software; computer and video game apparatus, namely, video game machines for use with televisions; telephones; radio telephones; radios; pre-recorded audio and video tapes featuring science fiction films and music; laser discs; DVD discs; video discs; phonograph records; compact discs; CD-ROMs featuring science fiction games, films and music; electronic calculators; batteries; sunglasses; carrying cases for portable electronic devices; head phones; audio cassette players and recorders; CD players; DVD players; magnets; modems; mouse pads; remote controls for radios, televisions and stereos; blank video tapes; photographic slide transparencies; cover for telephone receivers not made of paper; magnetically encoded telephone calling cards and transportation fare cardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2000EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 22, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 31, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 3, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 2, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 19, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 27, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 25, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 4, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 12, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance