USPTO serial 75307153
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CAROLE F. BARRETT
CAROLE F BARRETT COUDERT BROTHERS4 EMBARCADERO CTRSTE 3300SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | candied fruits, candied nuts, refried beans, fruit based snack foods, jellies, fruit snacks, namely, fruit rolls, potato chips, fried pork rinds, beef jerky, beef sticks, sunflower kernels and seeds, corn nuggets, roasted nuts, potato crisps, processed nuts, coleslaw, pre-cut vegetable salad, red beans | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | cookies, crackers, candies, chocolate, ice cream, frozen confections, frozen yogurt, mousse, puddings, cakes, pastries, breakfast cereals, cereal based snack foods, bubble gum, chewing gum, coffee, tea, cocoa, coffee substitutes, honey, flavored and sweetened gelatins, sauces, processed unpopped popcorn, brownies, bakery goods, barbecue sauce, bread, edible cake decorations, caramel popcorn, sandwich crackers, lollipops, popsicles, tacos, burritos, tostadas, fajitas, enchiladas, tortillas, nachos, taco salads, Mexican pizza, prepared fried flour confections, combination enchiladas and burritos, cooked chicken, coleslaw, potato salad and three bean salad, chicken sandwiches, macaroni salad, rice, gravy, biscuits, desserts, namely, pies and puddings, snack foods, namely, tortilla chips, corn chips, puffed corn snacks, and popped popcorn, pretzels, multigrain crackers, multigrain chips, multigrain snack bars, rice based snack foods, corn-based onion flavored snacks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 10, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 25, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |