USPTO serial 75307325
EDC SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 1, 2000
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with EDC SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ELECTRONIC DRIVES AND CONTROLS, INC.
PARSIPPANY, NJ
Other trademarks owned by ELECTRONIC DRIVES AND CONTROLS, INC.
Electromotive Fabrications, Inc.
Randolph, NJ
Electromotive Fabrications, Inc.
Randolph, NJ
Electromotive Fabrications, Inc.
Randolph, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TODD A. DENYS
TODD A. DENYS PORZIO, BROMBERG & NEWMAN, P.C.600 Alexander Road, Suite 2-1PRINCETON, NJ 08540UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | engineering services, namely, design construction testing and support of custom electronic drive system | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ELECTRONIC DRIVES AND CONTROLS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Electromotive Fabrications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Electromotive Fabrications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Electromotive Fabrications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EDC SYSTEMS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 17, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 17, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 16, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2020 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 31, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 20, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 7, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |