CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for VISUA

USPTO serial 75307820

VISUA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISUA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID A. WEINSTEIN

DAVID A WEINSTEIN1700 BROADWAY STE 1006DENVER, CO 80290-1001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Blank magnetic data carriers; data processors and computers, and peripherals therefor; and computer software for designing, implementing, documenting, and testing arbitrary software systems and component based software systems, for creating other software applications, for performing the simulation of real processes; excluding computer software for creating drawings and graphics and instructional manuals sold together as a unitACTIVE—
016Printed matter, namely, computer instruction manualsACTIVE—
042Computer programming; conducting research in the field of computer programming; rental of data processors, software for data processing and blank magnetic data carriers; and computer software development services for others, by mathematicians, computer scientists and physicistsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 27, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 21, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 17, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 21, 1999PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 26, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 25, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 27, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance