USPTO serial 75307968
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY H FECHTER
ED ULLMAN235 ORTIZ BLVDWARM MINERAL SPRINGS, FL 34287UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin care products, including, namely, face and body lotions, creams, cleansing milks, washes, toners and lotions, facial and body softening creams, body softening oils and beauty masques; toiletries, namely, body lotions and creams, body shampoos, bath oils, bath gels, milk baths, bath salts, bath bubbles and bath softening liquids | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | nutritional and dietary supplements | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | health services, namely, traditional and alternative heath care services; retail services, namely, on-premise stores featuring health, wellness and educational products, including books, magazines, compact discs, CD ROMs, tapes, chimes, candles and skin care products | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |