USPTO serial 75308169
BANDIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BANDIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELLIOT A SALTER
ELLIOT A SALTER SALTER & MICHAELSON321 S MAIN STPROVIDENCE, RI 02903UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | safety eyewear, namely, spectacles, frames and lens therefor | ACTIVE | Nov 17, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 10, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 2, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |