USPTO serial 75308703
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
RENESAS ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, JP
KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA HITACHI SEISAKUSHO
Tokyo, JP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Shapiro
JENNIFER M. MIKULINASuite 4400227 W. Monroe StreetChicago, IL 60606| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | microprocessors, microcontrollers, computer hardware controllers, computer controllers, circuit cards and central processor units (CPU) for computers, integrated circuits, and personal computers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 21, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 6, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 3, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 26, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 17, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |