USPTO serial 75309293
FASHION ENGINEERING UNIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BONNET, ODETTE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FASHION ENGINEERING UNIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
50123 FIRENZE, IT
50123 FIRENZE, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDNA WEINER
EDNA WEINER COWAN DEBAETS ABRAHAMS & SHEPPARD LLP40 W 57TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | interactive multimedia computer programs which entertain and inform about fashion as it relates to culture | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 6, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 4, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |