USPTO serial 75309527
MOZART SALZBURG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOZART SALZBURG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Independence GmbH, Unternehmensberatung, Beteillgung und Handel
80805 Munich, DE
Other trademarks owned by Independence GmbH, Unternehmensberatung, Beteillgung und Handel
MUNICH, DE
MUNICH, DE
Salzburg, AT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy J. Benjamin and Andrew Baum
AMY J BENJAMIN & ANDREW BAUM DARBY & DARBY PCPO BOX 5257NEW YORK, NY 10150-5257UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers | ACTIVE | Mar 28, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Independence GmbH, Unternehmensberatung, Beteillgung und Handel
- Other trademarks owned by MOZARTLAND HANDELS-GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by MOZARTLAND HANDELS-GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by Next to Mozart-Handels GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named MOZART SALZBURG
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 17, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 18, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |