USPTO serial 75309766
JUST IN-GENIUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JUST IN-GENIUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Don Mills, Ontario, CA
Don Mills, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W DENNIS MOSS
W DENNIS MOSS RIDOUT & MAYBEE LLP150 METCALFE ST FL 19OTTAWA, ON K2P 1P1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ultraviolet filters; electronic equipment, namely ultraviolet sensors and solar cells; anti-intrusion alarms; electronic measuring devices, namely biomedical equipment, namely, heart rate monitors, and biomedical diagnosis equipment, namely calorie burn rate monitors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 28, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 19, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |