Drawing for AIRTROL

USPTO serial 75309767

AIRTROL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KLINE, MATTHEW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AIRTROL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BARRY BRETSCHNEIDER

AMY J BENJAMIN DARBY & DARBY805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011air volume control sold as a unit for an air handling system of a commercial, industrial or institutional building, namely, a centrifugal fan, a fan mounting comprising tracks and a wheeled mounting frame adapted to move on said tracks to enable horizontal movement of the centrifugal fan, and an operator capabe of moving the wheeled mounting frame and the fan mounted thereonACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2000ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 14, 2000OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 14, 2000OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jun 17, 1999OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 17, 1999OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 18, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 1999OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 16, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 14, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance