USPTO serial 75309767
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
M & I Heat Transfer Products Ltd.
Mississauga, Ontario, L5A 3X6, CA
M & I Heat Transfer Products Ltd.
Mississauga, Ontario, L5A 3X6, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARRY BRETSCHNEIDER
AMY J BENJAMIN DARBY & DARBY805 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | air volume control sold as a unit for an air handling system of a commercial, industrial or institutional building, namely, a centrifugal fan, a fan mounting comprising tracks and a wheeled mounting frame adapted to move on said tracks to enable horizontal movement of the centrifugal fan, and an operator capabe of moving the wheeled mounting frame and the fan mounted thereon | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 18, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 1999 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |