USPTO serial 75309855
BEANTOWN CAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEANTOWN CAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN B POKOTILOW
MICHELE P SCHWARTZ STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP180 MAIDEN LNNEW YORK, NY 10038-4982UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | prepackaged, ready to eat foods sold primarily to convenience stores, namely, prepared foods, namely, cheese, cheese spreads, cheese substitutes, chicken, chili (with or without beans), chowder, cole slaw, cream cheese, salad dressings, prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry and/or vegetables; french fried potatoes, fruit-based spreads; jams, jellies, fruit salads, garden salads, vegetable salads, seafood salads, all additional salads except macaroni, rice and pasta; soups, and stews; snack foods, namely, potato chips, fruit chips, dairy-based and non-dairy snack food dips, and fruit-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | prepackaged, ready to eat foods sold primarily to convenience stores, namely, prepared foods, namely, sandwiches; and desserts, namely, cakes, pies, tarts, brownies, blondies, crepes, frozen confections, frozen and non-frozen yogurt, ice milk, ice cream, fruit ice, flavored ices, sorbet, frozen custards, cookies, doughnuts, fried dough, eclairs; and snack foods, namely, pretzels, corn chips, flour-based chips, grain-based chips, tortilla chips, wheat-based snack foods, popcorn, popped cereal based snack foods, ready to eat cereal derived food bars, cheese flavored puffed corn snacks, puffed corn snacks, and crackers; and other prepared foods, namely, empanadas, enchiladas, burritos, tacos, prepared meals consisting of pasta or rice, fajitas, pizza, hot dog and hamburger sandwiches, bagels, bakery goods and products, biscuits, breads, muffins, bread sticks, pastries, oatmeal; macaroni, pasta or rice salads, salsa, salad dressings, pastas and pot-pies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |