Drawing for Serial No. 75309886

USPTO serial 75309886

Serial No. 75309886

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARRUTHERS, SUE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75309886?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH DIAMANTE

JOSEPH DIAMANTE PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025men's, women's and children's clothing, namely, jeans, pants, skirts, dresses, shortsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2001ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 5, 2001EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 5, 2001EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 28, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 12, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 17, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 30, 1999IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Sep 8, 1999AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 2, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 1999IURFIU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 1999IUFFUSE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES—
Jun 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 21, 1999IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 21, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 1998LOPTLETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED—
Mar 4, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance