Drawing for OPTEX MORSE

USPTO serial 75310365

OPTEX MORSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with OPTEX MORSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KAUSHAL R ODEDRA

KAUSHAL R ODEDRA WENDEROTH LIND & PONACK2033 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007electro-mechanical automatic door operating units and hydraulic door openersACTIVE—
009Electronic sensor for electro-mechanical automatic door operating units and hydraulic door openers; active type electronic sensor using near-infrared radiation, passive type electronic sensor receiving far-infrared radiation; active type electronic sensor using near-infrared radiation, passive type electronic sensor receiving far-infrared radiation, radio detection system namely, microwave sensor for alarms; radio transmitter, radio receiver, electric security alarms namely, burglar alarms, theft alarms and fire alarms; electronic aural guide controller; electronic sensor light; light with electronic sensor, noncontact thermometer; radio thermometer, photo electronic sensor; photo switch, fiber photo switch; compact transparency measurement electronic sensor, touch pad control panel for burglar, theft and/or fire alarms; digital cameraACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 29, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 10, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance