USPTO serial 75310769
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK B HARRISON
MARK B HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use in data base management, for use as a spread sheet, for use in word processing, for use in electronic mail transmission and distribution, for use in personal information management; web server software for connecting existing databases to websites; computer software for use in website design and computer software for use in searching and browsing databases and information networks; and user manuals sold therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | On-line retail store for services featuring computer software | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, maintaining web sites for others; computer services, namely, hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |