USPTO serial 75311456
SGT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SGT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
640 61 Stallarholmen, SE
640 61 Stallarholmen, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS V SMURZYNSKI
THOMAS V SMURZYNSKI LAHIVE & COCKFIELD LLP28 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SGT MAACHINERY AKTIEBOLAG
- Other trademarks owned by SGT MAACHINERY AKTIEBOLAG
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named SGT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 25, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |