USPTO serial 75312306
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK H HELLMANN
MARK H HELLMANN HOLLEB & COFF55 E MONROE ST STE 4100CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | home safety devices, namely, devices to measure microwave leakage from microwave ovens, devices to measure the efficacy of sunscreen in blocking ultraviolet rays, devices to measure the efficacy of sun glasses in blocking harmful rays of the sun, devices to measure the likelihood of sunburn, devices to measure the level of carbon dioxide in the air, devices to measure lead levels, devices to measure water quality, and other devices for testing the safety and efficacy of products and devices used in the home | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | lint traps and kitchen utensils, namely, bottle openers, can openers, vegetable crispers, condiment servers, coasters, shell-fish shellers and others | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | table linens, namely, dish cloths, pot holders, oven mitts and others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |