USPTO serial 75312517
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VERONICA COLBY DEVITT
Veronica Colby Devitt Marlene J. WilliamsP.O. Box 26769Nixon Peabody LLPSan Francisco, CA 94126| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | fresh grapes grown and sold to wine producers for wine making | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 2, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |