Drawing for CONCURRENT PROGRAMMING SYSTEM

USPTO serial 75312586

CONCURRENT PROGRAMMING SYSTEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2203374Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 10, 1998
Examiner
LORENZO, GEORGE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CONCURRENT PROGRAMMING SYSTEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN C. BAUM

JOHN C. BAUM TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CENTER, 8TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electronic machines for transfer of digital program codes into digital memories and gating instructions into gate arraysSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2021CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Nov 10, 2017REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2010CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 9, 2009RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Sep 9, 200989AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Aug 27, 2009PCGRPETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2009APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 13, 2009PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2009PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Jun 8, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2008PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Dec 11, 2008PLGLASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL—
Nov 7, 2008E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 6, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 20, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 29, 20048.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Aug 16, 20048.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Aug 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 1998R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Sep 27, 1998CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance