USPTO serial 75312658
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ATLANTA, GA
Young, Clark & Associates, Inc.
Stone Mountain, GA
Young, Clark & Associates, Inc.
Stone Mountain, GA
Young, Clark & Associates, Inc.
Stone Mountain, GA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd Deveau, Scott A. Horstemeyer, Randy R. Schoen, Scott P. Amy, Marlena F. Burt, N. Andrew Crain, Michael J. D'Aurelio, Robert D. Gravois, Daniel R. Gresham, Charles W. Griggers, David J. Hayzer, Kenneth A. Knox, Cynthia J. Lee, Christopher B. Linder, J
Todd Deveau, Scott A. Horstemeyer, Randy R. Schoen Thomas Horstemeyer, LLP3200 Windy Hill Road, SESuite 1600EATLANTA, GA 30339| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | project consulting services for large industrial/manufacturing companies for planning and delivering projects on time and on budget involving the facilitation and mentoring of project teams responsible for the planning and control of projects, namely, product development/introduction, reengineering/core process redesign, facility start-up/equipment installation, major maintenance, information technology development/implementation, and/or marketing program development/implementation, and development and implementation of infrastructure supporting the application of management of such projects within such organization | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1997 |
| 041 | teaching services, namely, training programs for teaching methodologies and techniques of project management for large industrial/manufacturing companies for planning and delivering projects on time and for teaching the use of software tools in the management of such projects | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2021 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 16, 2021 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 12, 2021 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 29, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2009 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 31, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 31, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 17, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 8, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 29, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 23, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |