Drawing for DURAFLEX THE SMART MACHINE

USPTO serial 75312953

DURAFLEX THE SMART MACHINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ODIN, RITA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DURAFLEX THE SMART MACHINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HOWARD G BRUSS

ROBERT C COLLINS BARNES, KISSELLE, RAISCH, CHOATEWHITTENMORE & HULBERT3500 PENOBSCOT BLDG 645 GRISWOLDDETROIT, MI 48226-4217

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007glass container forming machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 1999ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 10, 1999OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 10, 1999OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Sep 9, 1998OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 19, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 26, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 10, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 23, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance