USPTO serial 75313118
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SCHWEIZERISCHE SCHALMUHLE E. ZWICKY AG
8554 Mullheim-Wigoltingen, CH
Other trademarks owned by SCHWEIZERISCHE SCHALMUHLE E. ZWICKY AG
SCHWEIZERISCHE SCHALMUHLE E. ZWICKY AG
8554 Mullheim-Wigoltingen, CH
Other trademarks owned by SCHWEIZERISCHE SCHALMUHLE E. ZWICKY AG
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KEVIN G SMITH
KEVIN G SMITH SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK & SEAS PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | preparations made from cereals, in particular grain, breakfast foods, corn flakes, mixtures of cereal in grain or flake form with fruits, milk, sugar and/or nuts, mixtures of untoasted, rolled oats and dried fruits | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 12, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |