Drawing for CONSUMERSFIRST

USPTO serial 75313377

CONSUMERSFIRST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONSUMERSFIRST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LORRAINE PINSENT

LORRAINE PINSENT BENNETT JONES LLP855-2ND ST SW4500 BANKERS HALLCALGARY, AB T2P 0K7

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007home and commercial appliances, namely, dishwashers, clothes washers and trash compactersACTIVE—
009Energy control, monitoring and conservation devices, namely, heating, ventilation and cooling zone controllers, switchers and timers; lighting zone controllers, switchers and timers; photovoltaic and motion sensors; power monitoring sensors and alarms; emergency equipment shut-down switches; and uninterruptible power supply controllersACTIVE—
011Home and commercial appliances, namely, furnaces, air conditioners, building air ventilation equipment, chillers, heat pumps, humidifiers, dehumidifiers air cleaners, central heating boilers, potable water boilers, water heaters portable water tank heaters, space heaters, infrared heaters, clothes dryers, refrigerators, freezers, microwave ovens, fireplace heaters, hot plates, griddles, toasters, and gas lightsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 23, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 5, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 7, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 30, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2000CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 24, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 24, 1999ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 16, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 17, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 1998UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance