Drawing for ORGANIC ESSENTIALS

USPTO serial 75313701

ORGANIC ESSENTIALS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KULICK, LIZBETH B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORGANIC ESSENTIALS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

L S VAN LANDINGHAM III

12921 BRIDGER DRGERMANTOWN, MD 20874UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005acne creams, pain relief creams and first aid creams, for topical use and not for ingestionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 14, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2001REINREINSTATED—
May 30, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 30, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 14, 2000DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 4, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 1, 2000DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 11, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 9, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance