USPTO serial 75313841
PEERDIRECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2884494Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 14, 2004
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PEERDIRECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MISSISSAUGA, CA
CURRENT NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
MISSISSAUGA, Ontario, L5K 2N6, CA
Other trademarks owned by CURRENT NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
BEDFORD, MA
BEDFORD, MA
BEDFORD, MA
BEDFORD, MA
BEDFORD, MA
BEEDFORD, MA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter E. Markman, Esq.
Peter E. Markman, Esq. PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION14 OAK PARKBEDFORD, MA 01730UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software, namely, software for use in database development, implementation and management, and user guides and manuals for such software sold therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1997 |
| 042 | [ Computer software design, application development and consultation services ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PEERDIRECT INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CURRENT NETWORK TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by PEERDIRECT COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PEERDIRECT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PEERDIRECT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by PEERDIRECT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by 3959715 NOVA SCOTIA COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PEERDIRECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 30, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |