Drawing for PINEAPPLE

USPTO serial 75313935

PINEAPPLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PINEAPPLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID K FIEDLAND

DAVID K FIEDLAND LOTT & FRIEDLAND PAP O BOX 141098CORAL GABLES, FL 33114-1098UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016paper products, namely, art, art paper, copy paper, computer paper, fibre paper, gummed paper, loose leaf paper, writing paper, stationery, note pads, notebooks, paper gift boxes, gift cards, paper holiday cards, greeting cards, gift wrapping paper, and paper to be sold in bulk for use as packaging materialABANDONED—
040custome manufacture of specialty paper in bulkABANDONED—
042printing; converting of custom printing jobs for others in the nature, of including but not limited to, made to order day timers, pads, brochures, notebooks, packaging, promotional materialsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 21, 1999ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 20, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 1998ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance