USPTO serial 75314325
BABYBORNEO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BABYBORNEO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
93716 Kuching, Sarawak, MY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R REAMS GOODLOE JR
R REAMS GOODLOE JR R. REAMS GOODLOE, PSSTE 10224722 104TH AVE SEKENT, WA 98030-5322Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | carbonated soft drinks with natural fruit flavor; carbonated fruit drinks with natural fruit flavor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 29, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |