USPTO serial 75324928
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN T RAFFLE
JOHN T RAFFLE TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical devices, namely, a computerized surgical manipulation system comprised of surgeon's console, master control, immersive video display, surgical manipulation system software and instructional manuals provided as a unit; patient-side cart with set-up arms and manipulator slave arms, sterile adaptors to connect arms to instruments; medical devices, namely, a full line of resposable (limited re-use) tools, namely, laparoscopes, endoscopes, trocars, cannulas, cutters, clamps, elevators, gouges, knives, scope preheaters, light sources, cables and component parts, electrosurgical instruments, electrocautery instruments, laser instruments, ultrasound instruments, lens cleaning, scrub and biopsy brushes, clip appliers and clips, tack appliers and tacks, applicators, ligature carriers/needle holders, clamps/hemostats/graspers, curettes, instrument guides, ligature passing and knotting instruments, needles, retractors, snares, stylets, forceps, dissectors, calipers, scissors, suction/irrigation probes, sterile drapes, hemostats, amputation hooks, osteotomes, saws, retainer, suturing apparatus, measuring tapes, chisels and contractors, files, skin graft expanders, lancet, mallets, pliers, hammers, rasps, spatulas, and strippers; full line of FDA Classes I and II exempt surgical instruments, namely, scalpels, scalpel blades and handles, staplers, tacker, clip appliers, electrocautery tools, forceps, needle holders, guides and drivers, graspers, and kiteners | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting seminars, conferences, workshops, reference site training, and classes for physicians in the field of minimally invasive surgical procedures and in the use of minimally invasive surgical devices and distributing training manuals, white papers and journals in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | medical services, namely, conducting minimally invasive surgery | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 11, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |