USPTO serial 75325258
OOGY AND THE COCKROACHES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OOGY AND THE COCKROACHES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
92200 Neuilly sur Seine, FR
92200 Neuilly sur Seine, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRERECORDED VIDEO TAPES, EXPOSED CINEMATOGRAPHIC FILMS, PHONOGRAPH RECORDS, AUDIO-VIDEO DISCS, MAGNETIC DISCS, OPTICAL DISCS, FLOPPY DISCS, READ ONLY MEMORY DISCS, EXPOSED FILMS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND PROGRAMS, ALL FEATURING THEATER PRODUCTION RECORDINGS, MUSIC, MOTION PICTURE FILMS AND ANIMATED CARTOONS; COMPUTER UTILITY PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF THEATER, MUSIC AND MOTION PICTURE FILMS; VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISIONS; VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES; VIDEO GAME INTERACTIVE REMOTE CONTROL UNITS; VIDEO GAME JOYSTICKS; COMPUTER MONITORS; AUDIO MONITORS; VIDEO MONITORS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |